Sunday, April 14, 2013

Football Training Program Off Season - EPIC SOCCER Education The solution for significant soccer players who want to see rapidly, remarkable improvements in their soccer skills and become a genuinely game-changing player. . Learn more..

The #1 Ranked Soccer Training Program.





BCS No More: College Football Wants Playoffs to eradicate the BS

For years there has been a need for any playoff method in Division I-A (Football Bowl Subdivision) football. The creation on the BCS in 1999 was supposed to remedy this ill, nevertheless it has only compounded the issue. An undefeated Auburn was shunned in 2004, Boise State's undefeated 2006 season which incorporated a win more than heavily-favored Oklahoma within the Fiesta Bowl was not worthy of a opportunity at a National Championship and this season will see a minimum of a single one-loss group within the BCS Championship with other qualified one-loss conference champions on the outside seeking in. This can be what we get in touch with within the true world a C.F.

Within the past handful of months the concept of a college football playoff has a renewed fire. When interviewed the evening ahead of his election win more than John McCain, President-elect Barack Obama stated that an 8-team playoff was a must. A couple of quick weeks later, Obama told 60 Minutes that he would "throw his weight around" to view what he can do to acquire an 8-team college football playoff began. Even though I really like Obama's enthusiasm around the topic there is certainly a lot more that demands to be ironed out.

Under you'll discover my program for a 16-team college football playoff. I am certain that numerous will disagree with me on this subject and I expect it. For those who have a far better strategy e-mail it to me at -fans.com and we'll add it in our alternate plans & comments section.

Prior to getting into the details, the regular season demands to become cut back to 11 games for every group. Since Conference Championship Games are basically a have to in today's game, we require to require every conference to possess a Championship Game or just deal with the disadvantage of not playing the extra week as the Big Ten has done for years now and done nothing to remedy. Also, no more 13th game of the season @ Hawaii to end the regular season for BCS Conference teams. Last season it was Washington, this year Cincinnati travels to face the Warriors despite having 12 games under their belts already just a week after Washington State fell to 2-11 with a loss @ Hawaii.

I have chosen the 16-team format for a single reason and one reason alone. FAIRNESS, something that has long been neglected by the NCAA for Division I-A Football Bowl Subdivision football. You see, the whole thought on the BCS basically limits any genuine opportunity at any kind of a fair chance for 45 of the 120 Division I-A college football programs in 2009. With 65 teams in BCS Conferences and over 90% from the BCS Bowl Game bids (and the $17 million payout for playing in those games, win or lose), the deck is stacked against the non-BCS teams inside the WAC, Mountain West, MAC, Conference USA & Sun Belt. Add in the whole Notre Dame special name recognition and money clause and the whole deal is even more corrupt. So we start with 16 teams - 11 conference champions and 5 at-large bids.

The BCS computers, the same computers that somehow placed Oklahoma more than Texas for the 5th tie-breaker inside the Big 12 South this season despite Texas' win over the Sooners in the regular season, can be put to a new use under my plan. The BCS formula can now be used to help determine seeding for our new playoff technique for college football. Seeds 1-6 can remain with the 6 BCS conferences (unless a new conference were to emerge as a BCS member) and the rest in the seeds can be determined by a selection committee (much like the NCAA Tournament) and the BCS numbers, which are the equivalent of college basketball's RPI rankings.

For example, based on the 2007 BCS rankings, our playoff would include these 16 teams inside the following order:
1. Ohio State (Big Ten Champion) vs. 16. Florida Atlantic (Sun Belt Champion)
2. LSU (SEC Champion) vs. 15 Central Michigan (MAC Champion)
3. Virginia Tech (ACC Champion) vs. 14 UCF (Conference USA Champion)
4. Oklahoma (Big 12 Champion) vs. 13 BYU (MWC Champion)
5. USC (Pac-10 Champion) vs. 12 Florida (at-large, BCS #12)
6. West Virginia (Big East Champion) vs. 11 Arizona State (at-large, BCS #11)
7. Georgia (at-large, BCS #5) vs. 10 Hawaii (WAC Champion, BCS #10)
eight. Missouri (at-large, BCS #6) vs. 9 Kansas (at-large, BCS #8)

How this playoff would have ended none of us will ever know, but what would likely have avoided is highly-hyped BCS Championship Game blowouts like the previous two seasons where Ohio State could not matchup with Florida and LSU of the SEC.

2008 is even much more interesting. Normally, a non-BCS conference group demands to finish in the Top 12 on the final BCS rankings to be BCS bowl-eligible, or within the Top 16 with a minimum of one other BCS conference champion ranked under them. This season, we have 3 non-BCS conference teams within the BCS Top 12 with Utah being guaranteed a BCS Bowl berth. However, whilst an undefeated Boise State has far more BCS wins in the past two years in half as a lot of games, it seems likely that the "sexier" Ohio State will instead be cashing in on another $17 million although a higher-ranked and a lot more deserving Boise State gets left out of the BCS. Remember when I mention fairness above?

So what do we do with the bowls? I enjoy bowl games as much as anyone, and I do not want them to go away nor do they require to be eliminated. A 16-game tournament means 15 games will be played, 15 games that can be hosted by the Top 7 bowls, matched up regionally as best as possible, with the four big-money (current) BCS bowl games, the Rose, Orange, Fiesta & Sugar hosting the College Football Final Eight through the National Championship.

The 16-team format eliminates the want for 8 traditional bowl games, thus the current 34 bowl games will be reduced to 26 bowls. Some overlap will likely be needed with the 3 non-BCS bowls involved within the first round of our playoff format, but this could allow some cities to double-dip and actually get two bowl-caliber games (a single bowl, one particular playoff game). This overlap could even be rotated to allow to get a greater economic impact to ensure the same cities do not get the tourism dollars year in and year out.

The 26 bowl games would be handled the same as today; conference affiliations & agreements. Of course a 6 win season will still be required for bowl eligibility.

So there you have it, a 16-team playoff format. Critics will begin with arguments like "that's too many games for these student athletes" or a focus around the academics and the hardships these college students would be under if they advance to the 16-team playoff and keep playing. My counter to that is that academics did not decide the 12th game that was recently added to everyone's schedule inside the Football Bowl Subdivision, and academics don't seem to matter in breaking the Texas-Oklahoma-Texas Tech debate for the Big 12 South title and Big 12 Championship debate, so quit saying you care about anything other than money. Some may wonder how to handle the dollars in a playoff program. Much like the professional sports, teams are rewarded with additional revenue the farther they advance in the playoffs. The traditional bowls can remain the same while the playoff method will be based on a predetermined amount, much like today's $17 million payout in each BCS Bowl Game.

At the end in the season all teams under .500 will end with 11 football games, those who play in traditional bowl games will play 12 games, conference championship participants a minimum of 13 games (unless a conference championship loser finished with a 5-7 record, a very rare result), and playoff participants would play a minimum of 13 and a maximum of 16 games.

Look, there's obviously no exact solution that everyone will like. An 8-team playoff is actually a nice notion, but this once again likely keeps all non-BCS conference champions around the outside seeking in. The thrill on the NCAA Tournament is when a heavy favorite collides with an underdog, and this program allows for underdogs to possess a fair possibility. While I understand that the University Presidents who make these decisions are hunting for much more revenue wherever it can be found, this system opens the doors for that revenue based around the teams that deserve it the most by earning it for their school's athletics department and their conference on the field.

0 comments:

Post a Comment